How do we portray history? It is a question that really has
no right answer, and many people will not give same response. A soldier who
fought in Vietnam might have a different answer compared a historian who has
never fought in battle. An important aspect of our history is the deaths of
soldiers who fought for our nations freedom. Is it more accurate to signify
these soldier’s deaths in a nonlinear narrative or a linear cenotaph? A
nonlinear narrative is typically a story told by a soldier and a linear cenotaph
is structure that gives exact names and events to a war. A nonlinear narrative
is a true representation of American soldiers’ history because the human minds
are not made to remember events in the past in linear fashion. Using a
nonlinear narrative connects with more people and paints a picture for them so they
can connect it to their personal lives. A soldier’s memory, and even his wife’s
memory on the Homefront, does not contain the events of the war in
chronological order. They remember what is most important to them and the
events that make them who they are today. O’Brien writes, “When Ted Lavender
was shot, they used his poncho to wrap him up, then carry him across the patty”
(O’Brien 3). He interrupts his descriptions
of the soldiers and flashes to this scene because this memory of Ted Lavender
appears in his head. He cannot help what occurs in his memory and when it
happens. If we remember historical events in a linear manner then we have no
emotional connection to them; they are arranged in a timeline in our head, that
never stops to see the beauties and tragedies of a war. Although some may perceive
this way of remembering history to be just a story and not represent the
accuracy of the war, it is true to say nobody knows the “truths” of war. What might
be true for one soldier can be false for another. The point is that many people
exaggerate or underestimate the events of war. Although we try, there is no way
to perfectly portray our nations bloody history, even if we record every date on
a piece of paper.


I really like how you used examples to support your claims. The use of rhetorical questions also adds depth to your post. However, I would have liked to see more insight into why you think linear narratives are not as accurate. You do a really good job explaining why non-linear narratives are effective, but don't touch too much about linear narratives.
ReplyDelete